Has somebody changed the rules? – A Message to Whiners
This is a piece bitching about one of my pet peeves, prompted by recent articles critical of SCOTUS decision allowing Donald Trump to be placed on the Colorado presidential ballot. While I understand there are many who disagree with the decision, the vitriol being spewed upon SCOTUS is an open insult to the Justices integrity, the founding principles of the Republic, and the rule of law.
Based on the “rules,” or “guiding principles” I was taught in public school as a child, in matters where SCOTUS is petitioned to render a judgement, the first test of relevancy is whether the matter is relevant to Federal Law - - that is, a matter specified in the Constitution of the United States, from which Federal Judiciary authority originates. If a matter is NOT within the very limited scope of Federal authority, it is not eligible for SCOTUS review and final decision is the responsibility of the ‘governing authority’: local or State law, or the People.
And so, as I replied to the news in The Epoch Times article “Key Takeaways From Supreme Court Trump Ballot Ruling”
For all the “whiners” out there – -
SCOTUS is not in place to cater to popular (or unpopular) public whim, but to protect the written law as stated in the Constitution of the United States – honestly, impartially, and without regard to politics.
Not an easy job, and sometimes unpopular – – . In fact, ALL SCOTUS decisions are almost certainly sure to offend SOMEONE – – It is the nature of their responsibility.
For those with serious objection to SCOTUS decisions, the very Constitution that established their authority also provides an “appeal” process; amend the Constitution to make the law more to your liking. It is a long and arduous process – as it should be. If you have an issue, get to work on your amendment proposal, and QUIT your WHINING!
(Rebuttal/Discussion welcome)
1 Comment
No posts
I miss Scalia.